The Troubled FDIC: Why Giving Them a Blank Check is a Bad Idea

Dec 24, 2023

The Troubled FDIC: Why Giving Them a Blank Check is a Bad Idea

The recent reports of discrimination, harassment, and a toxic workplace culture at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) have raised concerns among members of both parties in Congress. However, instead of holding the FDIC leadership accountable and waiting for the investigations to conclude, there are calls to give them even more power without any accountability. This article will explore why giving the troubled FDIC a blank check is a bad idea.

A Call for Accountability

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Senate Democrats have called for the FDIC to investigate and remove wrongdoers within the agency. They argue that allowing employees who have engaged in misconduct to stay in their positions compromises public trust in the FDIC. However, despite this concern, Brown is pushing for a bill that would increase the FDIC’s powers while the investigation is still ongoing, and the alleged wrongdoers are still employed.

The RECOUP Act and Increased Powers

The RECOUP (Recovering Executive Compensation Obtained from Unaccountable Practices) Act, approved by the Senate Banking Committee in July, aims to hold executives accountable at large banks and curb risky practices. However, it also significantly increases the FDIC’s powers to remove the leadership of any U.S. bank it supervises, even if the bank is not deemed at risk of failure. This broad authority to remove bank executives would give the FDIC an unprecedented level of discretion.

Concerns about FDIC’s Discretion

Recent reports highlight that the FDIC has not exercised discretion effectively in the past. The Wall Street Journal’s investigation, titled “Sex, Booze, and Bank Regulation,” reveals a culture of discrimination and harassment within the FDIC, contributing to a toxic workplace environment. Former and current female employees reported being denied opportunities due to sexism, and similar allegations of discrimination and harassment against black FDIC employees have also surfaced.

Impact on Banks and Executives

The toxic behavior exhibited by FDIC employees towards their colleagues raises concerns about potential abuses towards the personnel at banks under their supervision. The RECOUP Act gives the FDIC examiners the power to remove bank executives, leaving those affected with limited recourse against these decisions. Bank officials penalized under this act will have minimal grounds to challenge the FDIC’s decisions, as there is no judicial review until after lengthy administrative proceedings.

List of important keywords: FDIC, blank check, accountability, Senate Banking Committee, RECOUP Act, increased powers, toxic workplace culture, discretion, discrimination, harassment, abuse, bank officials, bank executives

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the RECOUP Act?
  2. The RECOUP Act is a legislative proposal aimed at holding executives accountable at large banks and reducing risky practices. It also grants the FDIC increased powers to remove the leadership of any U.S. bank it supervises.

  3. Why is giving the troubled FDIC a blank check a bad idea?
  4. Giving the troubled FDIC a blank check is a bad idea because it lacks accountability and allows for potential abuses of power. The FDIC has been plagued by reports of discrimination, harassment, and a toxic workplace culture, making it inappropriate to grant them more authority without addressing these issues first.

  5. What are the concerns with the FDIC’s discretion?
  6. Recent reports have highlighted instances where the FDIC has exercised poor discretion, contributing to a toxic workplace culture. This raises concerns that the same behavior could be directed towards personnel in banks under the FDIC’s supervision.

  7. How does the RECOUP Act impact bank officials and executives?
  8. The RECOUP Act gives the FDIC the power to remove bank executives based on its own judgment, without the need for a bank to be at risk of failure. This leaves bank officials with limited recourse to challenge the FDIC’s decisions, potentially resulting in unfair penalties.

For more information about banking and finance, please visit https://visbanking.com/.
To learn about our pricing, visit https://visbanking.com/pricing/.
To request a demo, go to https://visbanking.com/request-demo/.

Learn more on this topic

Related Blog Posts

Mastering Well-Rounded Organizational Leadership

Mastering Well-Rounded Organizational Leadership

Mastering Well-Rounded Organizational Leadership Are you looking to enhance your leadership skills and take your organizational role to the next level? Look no further than the comprehensive class from Trevor Steedman on mastering well-rounded organizational...

Join in the conversation

Leave a Comment

0 Comments