Lessons from the Financial Crisis
Lesson 1: Inadequate Risk Measurement
One of the lessons learned from the financial crisis was the inadequacy of the value-at-risk (VaR) measure. VaR, which was designed to measure the risk of short-term fluctuations in market prices, failed to appropriately capture low probability tail events, market liquidity risk, and credit risk. In essence, VaR was not calibrated to account for periods of significant stress. This weakness in the trading book framework highlights the need for more accurate and comprehensive risk measurement tools.
Lesson 2: Lack of Withdrawal Option for Regulators
Another lesson learned was the lack of a credible option for regulators to withdraw approval of internal market risk models. This was partly due to the fact that standardized approaches did not provide a credible backstop. Additionally, model approval was done at the banking organization-level, rather than at a more granular level like the trading desk. As a result, there was limited regulatory power to address weaknesses in risk models, leading to potential vulnerabilities in the banking system.
Lesson 3: Capital Arbitrage Opportunities
The boundary between the trading and banking books created opportunities for capital arbitrage. Banks were incentivized to classify instruments as “held with trading intent” even if there was no regular trading. This allowed banks to benefit from reduced capital requirements on the trading book. The exploitation of this boundary highlighted the need to better align capital requirements with underlying market risks and reduce incentives for taking on tail risk or engaging in capital arbitrage.
Director McKernan’s Views on Basel III Endgame Proposal
Director Jonathan McKernan expressed his views on the Basel III Endgame proposal, emphasizing the importance of aligning capital requirements with market risks and reducing incentives for risk-taking. He raised concerns about design decisions made by the Basel Committee and echoed his dissenting opinion on the proposal. However, he also suggested that the Endgame debate need not be binary and proposed a phased approach to finalizing the reforms.
A Phased Approach to Basel III Endgame Proposal
Director McKernan proposed a phased approach to the Basel III Endgame proposal. In his speech, he stated that while he opposes efforts to reverse engineer higher capital requirements without considering costs and benefits, he supports enhancing the regulatory capital framework. He suggested finalizing the less contentious aspects of the Endgame market risk reforms and addressing the remaining issues through future notice-and-comment rulemakings. This approach would allow for rationalizing the U.S. implementation of the reforms.
Progress on Basel III Reforms
Given the bipartisan pushback on the Basel III Endgame proposal, Director McKernan’s suggestion of a phased approach offers a potential path towards making progress on finalizing parts of the reforms. This approach acknowledges the need for regulatory improvements while also considering the concerns and costs associated with implementing higher capital requirements.
It is important for regulators to strike a balance between enhancing the capital framework and ensuring that the reforms are practical, effective, and cost-efficient for the banking industry. The lessons learned from the financial crisis have highlighted the shortcomings of the current trading book framework and the need for comprehensive risk measurement tools.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Basel III?
Basel III is a set of international banking regulations developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. It aims to strengthen the banking sector by improving risk management and increasing capital requirements.
What is the Basel III Endgame proposal?
The Basel III Endgame proposal is the final set of reforms to be implemented under the Basel III framework. It includes measures to enhance the capital framework and align capital requirements with market risks.
What are the weaknesses in the trading book framework?
The weaknesses in the trading book framework identified by Director McKernan include inadequate risk measurement, lack of a withdrawal option for regulators, and capital arbitrage opportunities created by the boundary between the trading and banking books.
What is the phased approach proposed by Director McKernan?
Director McKernan’s phased approach suggests finalizing the less controversial aspects of the Basel III Endgame reforms and addressing the remaining issues through future rulemakings. This approach allows for progress to be made while also considering the costs and benefits of implementing higher capital requirements.
How will the reforms benefit the banking industry?
The reforms aim to align capital requirements with market risks, reduce incentives for risk-taking, and enhance the regulatory capital framework. By addressing the weaknesses in the trading book framework, the reforms can help strengthen the banking sector and improve risk management practices.
0 Comments