FDIC Proposes New Corporate Governance Standards for Banks with $10 Billion in Assets or More
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has put forth a proposal for new corporate governance standards that would apply to banks with $10 billion or more in total assets. These proposed standards aim to establish strict and comprehensive requirements for state-chartered banks, marking a departure from the traditional reliance on state law for governance and oversight obligations.
A Shift from Principles-Based to Rules-Based Governance
One notable aspect of the Proposed Standards is the shift from a principles-based approach to a rules-based approach to corporate governance. Unlike the flexibility offered by state law, the Proposed Standards lay out specific guidelines and mandates, leaving little room for banks to tailor their governance practices according to their individual needs and circumstances.
Critics argue that the concept of “good corporate governance” should not be treated as a one-size-fits-all model. What may be considered effective governance for one bank might not necessarily work for another. They emphasize the importance of default rules that can be customized and fiduciary duties that can be adapted in order to achieve truly effective corporate governance.
The Reaction and Dissent
The FDIC board approved the issuance of the Proposed Standards by a 3-2 vote, with Vice Chairman Travis Hill and Director Jonathan McKernan voicing their dissent with strong criticism towards the proposals. Their concerns likely stem from the perceived rigidity and potential unintended consequences that these new standards could introduce.
The Public Comment Period
The FDIC has announced that it will accept comments on the Proposed Standards for a period of 60 days after they are published in the Federal Register. This gives interested parties, including banks, industry experts, and other stakeholders, an opportunity to voice their opinions and provide feedback on the proposed changes.
Background on Governance and Risk Management at State-Chartered Banks
To understand the implications of the Proposed Standards, it is important to have a grasp of the existing governance and risk management landscape for state-chartered banks.
State-chartered banks are supervised and regulated by the FDIC as well as other state agencies. While specific governance and risk management requirements can vary from state to state, banks have historically relied on state law to establish their corporate governance practices and oversight obligations.
This decentralized approach has allowed banks to adapt their governance structures based on their unique circumstances, needs, and risks. The flexibility offered by state law has been seen as a strength, empowering banks to implement governance practices that are most suitable for their operations.
However, the FDIC’s proposal seeks to centralize and standardize corporate governance standards for banks with $10 billion or more in assets. This represents a significant departure from the previous reliance on state law, raising concerns among some industry professionals.
The Proposed Standards – A Closer Look
The Proposed Standards put forth by the FDIC cover a wide range of areas related to corporate governance and risk management. Some of the key aspects include:
1. Board of Directors:
– Composition and independence requirements
– Qualifications and expertise of directors
– Board responsibilities and oversight
2. Risk Management:
– Establishing a risk management framework
– Identifying, assessing, and managing risks
– Defining risk appetite and tolerance levels
3. Corporate Culture and Conduct:
– Promoting ethical behavior and integrity
– Establishing strong corporate values and a culture of compliance
– Encouraging accountability and transparency
4. Audit and Internal Controls:
– Ensuring the independence and effectiveness of internal audit functions
– Conducting regular internal audits and risk assessments
– Maintaining robust internal control systems
5. Compensation Policies:
– Aligning executive compensation with long-term performance and risk management
– Promoting responsible and balanced incentive structures
– Avoiding excessive risk-taking through compensation practices
6. Board Effectiveness and Performance:
– Establishing evaluation processes for board performance
– Ensuring effective communication and information flow
– Promoting ongoing board education and training
7. Shareholder Engagement:
– Encouraging shareholder participation and engagement
– Facilitating communication between shareholders and the board
– Protecting shareholder rights and interests
These proposed standards aim to enhance the overall governance and risk management practices of banks with $10 billion or more in assets. By setting specific requirements and guidelines, the FDIC intends to improve transparency, accountability, and stability within the banking sector.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. How will the FDIC’s Proposed Standards impact banks?
The Proposed Standards will affect state-chartered banks with $10 billion or more in total assets. These banks will be required to comply with the new governance and risk management guidelines outlined by the FDIC. The shift from principles-based to rules-based governance may introduce more rigidity and reduce flexibility for banks.
2. Are the Proposed Standards a departure from traditional practices?
Yes, the Proposed Standards represent a departure from traditional practices. State-chartered banks have historically relied on state law to establish their governance practices. The FDIC’s proposal seeks to centralize and standardize corporate governance standards, potentially limiting banks’ ability to tailor their governance structures according to their unique needs.
3. Why do some critics oppose the Proposed Standards?
Critics argue that ‘good corporate governance’ should not be treated as a uniform regulatory mandate. They emphasize the importance of tailoring governance practices to suit each bank’s specific circumstances, rather than implementing a one-size-fits-all approach. The rigidity and lack of customization options within the Proposed Standards are among the concerns expressed by critics.
4. How long is the public comment period for the Proposed Standards?
The public comment period for the Proposed Standards will last for 60 days after they are published in the Federal Register. During this period, banks, industry experts, and other stakeholders can express their opinions, provide feedback, and suggest potential modifications to the proposed standards.
For more information about corporate governance and risk management, visit [VisBanking](https://visbanking.com/). You can also check out our pricing plans [here](https://visbanking.com/pricing/) or request a demo [here](https://visbanking.com/request-demo/).
0 Comments